Posts Tagged ‘Camera’

[Nikon AF-S 70-300mm ED-IF VR] Landscape to Portrait Photography -

[Nikon AF-S 70-300mm ED-IF VR] Landscape to Portrait Photography – Everything is possible

by Lutz Ludwig

Short to me and the test of the lens.
Pictures for 30 years, specialty areas – Event – Animal – Landscape – eroticism.

Since I needed a second camera, which now for the first camera was when I landed Nikon – Nikon D200 and lenses 18-200 VR & 70-300.

The most important thing to first: All my customers have been extremely satisfied with the outcome image!

Now for the lens;
+ Super processed and relatively difficult ca.750gr.
+ VR (Verwacklungsschutz)
Aperture 4.5 + at 70 (each lens has its strengths at 2 Apertures Dimmer)
+ Minimal vignetting at the margin (fotogafiert who already have a white wall for displaying the vignetting?)
+ 75 to 300 razor-sharp images even when light conditions wiedrigen
+ Universal lens (no lens shift, and thus no threat to the dust-sensitive sensors and low-pass filter)
+ Portrait photography with excellent Kontorhaus Figure (70 -100 ideal)
+ Landscape photos in color or in class 300)
+ Animal photography awards, thanks to the great distance you can use
+ Ideal for D200 from Nikon

- Only protective pouch no fixed lens Quiver
- Too heavy for Nikon D40 and D80 (small camera) is very Objektivlastig – but still super image quality

Despite all the 5 stars
photograph has almost exclusively with the VR 18-200 & 70-300

translated from amazon.de customer review.

[Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM] Impressively

Let me first say that I am not a professional photographer or a lover with plenty of experience. I could not know everything there is to know about photography, but what I know is that I understand what happens in this light.

I was satisfied with the quality of construction (as I have my goals with unseine series ESigma X) und the first tests have shown that the autofocus is fast, precise and very quiet. This may not be a surprise for you with a bag full of lenses Canon L USM, but the consumption of the lens was a revelation.

I was very surprised by the width of 10 mm is a 1.6-crop camera (such as weapons and xxd xxxD lasts). I could almost to the questions and still managed to all parties involved in. raggiungerezioneextr?mengulos The effects of distortiontion, but the photos in my opinion.

The true joy is, however, when I returned from my first salidaci?n and began to sort the images. The colors are fantastic, the pictures were, without exception, very high and the possibilities for creating a lens, large images are far more than the usual “snapshots” of a photographer who produces my size.

Ultra-Wide Zoom hCanon echo can be better, and I have no doubt that with einer camera quality can lead to better results, but at this price, I can not find fault in the supply of Sigma.

[Nikon AF-S 60mm ED Micro] Dream lens with restrictions

R. Scheidler

Until 3 years ago I had the old “Micro Nikkor 2.8 / 60 AF on my D70 and D80 s in use. This lens was and still is for me beyond any doubt, just incredibly good processing of this metal is bolides I believe no other lens of this price class nearly reached. After seeing the old “lack of motives had sold, I have now after a long Umhersuchen, endless reading of many test reports and, not least because of the good reviews here at amazon for a new acquisition of the new Nikon 60s Micro AF-S decided.

First impression / Processing: The lens makes the opposite product photos, which is always a bit plastikm?ssig “r?berkam an extremely high quality processed and really solid impression. The bayonet lens body together is absolutely no doubt on professional applications and I am sure that even with tougher strain no mechanical problems to be expected. The lens is excellent in the hand, the bayonet bomb sits firmly in the camera. A clear point of criticism of the reconstruction of the 60s is the extremely wide front is the front lens, which the old model by more than the tube was super protected. In the new version is to use the supplied lens hood is an absolute must, if only to protect the front lens, which makes the lens but unnecessarily larger and requires (at least in my photo bag) a permanent set-up and removal of same.

Handling / Image: Because of the no longer existing aperture ring is the handle to check whether the correct aperture to the smallest value is locked and it says lens start and go. The autofocus makes the designation AF-S really all honor. Lightning fast and really close to the lens to slide silently into the focus area and sharp. Something better, I have not experienced this yet. The sharpness of the lens on my D300 is beyond any doubt, I have had from the first moment of razor-sharp images. As in many other tests mentioned, I can also confirm that the sharpness at open aperture is perfect and that dim (at least according to my perception) is no longer lets significantly increase. And I, as a user of a DX-sensor camera so generally the risk of blurred images combative, so I have a dim avoid as much as possible, since these lenses do not like the new 105er on a VR Micro has. The sharpness, however, is not in any great distance range. From Macro 1:1 to about 4-5 meters away motif I really very very good results, anything over 5 meters, it is noticeably vague, “I will not here the word deliberately blurred” use, because I know that here the critical Nikon D300 < -> Objketivtyp problem starts. (Meanwhile I have a lot of lenses tested and is not in itself a single place, the distance over the entire area a truly equal sharpness would have achieved – and no, I DO NOT send my camera to Nikon service, because it is not on the camera is located)

Now to the 2 for my criticisms of the existing lens, which for me, however, were so serious that I returned it to you: First, it is almost impossible with this lens at shorter motif Entfernungsbreichen (approximately 2-3 meters) a somewhat tolerable depth of focus to achieve. Especially for portraits, for which the lens is so perfect, it is almost impossible for both the nose and the eyes of the model equally sharp manner. The recoverable TS extends to a few centimeters, thus producing more usable Committee as images. The second major point of criticism, which I think is even worse: The AF-S 60 caused my camera to a blatant blue-pink color, especially in the portrait photography at extremely unnatural skin tones leads. Even under severe sunlight or different time of day, situations I could not eliminate this problem. This problem I have with any other lens had previously used, so I concur Fehleinstellung at the camera.

Who’s with these problems has to struggle, certainly gets a super lens, especially at a very fair price. I have paid 500 EUR for the current price of 449 EUR, this lens almost be described as a bargain. I give 4 out of 5 stars.

Oh yes, one more thing: Thanks to amazon for the turbo-shipping! Class as always!

translated from amazon.de customer review.

[Tamron 18-270] Perfect all-rounder

From Aleksei M.

First off – who at this focal length range and the price of a “eierlegende Wollmichsau” is expected to blame themselves. Of course, the lens is rather ambitious amateur photographers (I think the so-called “class” magazines) than for professionals. A professional with a zoom lens to 500.00 EUR buys and then complains that the lens and this is not possible, it is strongly in doubt of his career.

The lens, I would fully any DSLR beginner friend – alone on the ground because it is a very wide zoom range (or advanced course, like focal length range) and therefore covers the transition from compact cameras to easily. With the kit lens is seen as fast migrating desperate because you have more zoom is used. For “normal” hobby is photography, the lens is ideal and I would say exactly for it is thought.

Also remember you as a DSLR beginner because this lens is also very well, which corresponds to a missing. Say the question that sooner or later every DSLR owner is: “what lenses do I need yet?” or “what lenses I could buy yet?” you can then because of the experience with the Tamron 18-270 quite well for themselves clarify. For most amateur photographers will however point out that with the lens, the situation quite well, most can master.

For my part, I have noticed that I still need light lens, but with a much smaller focal area for the indoor shots in low light. This is the 18-270 a bit too weak, if you do not want to use flash.

The only point of criticism from my side is that the object is smooth. I know – there are quite a few recessions here to argue otherwise. The fact is that if the camera with the lens down and holding it only minimally extended is the object of rauskommt completely alone and vice versa – a little further inside than 270, and runs inside the lens when the camera stops to top . No idea whether these sizes is normal, but it bothers me. I photograph with a Canon 450D with Battariegriff and 430er Blitz – say the entire structure has a decent weight and I photograph in principle free-hand (as most of the photos at the moment my son is coming 1j?hrigen a tripod at the time not even in question , but otherwise I prefer to avoid it). To relieve the hand is quite good, and because the camera up or down to hold and it’s just annoying when the self lens makes. Compared to the 18-200 lens is the Tamron 18-270 also significantly harder, if somebody has a meaning – and especially in diameter and larger.

Conclusion: for a maximum of professionals as Universal Reisezoom, for all the other absolutely recommendable part, even if the price is twice as high. For more inexperienced, it is said – the zoom difference between 18-200 and 18-270 is not as big as you might imagine. On the supply side there is a very good Flash animation where you can try it. However, because of the stabilizer, I would recommend the 18-270 – is really in poor reception conditions, and some just go to it – perfect for shooting conditions make even the least bad lenses nice pictures.

translated from amazon.de customer review.

[Canon EF-S 10-22mm USM] Light and shadow in Canon-land

From ruessler

Canon offers the 10-22mm a lens with an extremely large picture angle – this area covers only the Sigma 10-20mm from.

But that is where the crux of the matter. In my experience, this lens with others in some respects not keep up – at least not that this is the extra cost would be justified.

However, only the 10-22mm from Canon. As already mentioned, it offers an extremely weitwinkligen focal length range – at a Canon camera with crop factor 1.6 16-35mm.

The optical performance is rather mediocre. A closer look at the pictures, there is a lack of this simple definition. Here I had the camera lens and Canon have already to date – but then they were not really better. Especially in open aperture is the performance rather than bad law. Only dimmed to see the pictures F8 halfway good.

The processing is rather mediocre. Feels great to plastikm??ig – pity. One of Canon’s impudence is no lens hood attached. This has to be around 30 extra to buy. And this is extremely large.

After some comparisons with other lenses, I find the Canon for mediocrity. The Sigma 10-20mm cuts because in some ways but better. It is – but not at the edges – sharper and more workable. This cheaper and there is a carrying bag along with Geli at. The Canon does not. The Canon is certainly less prone to scattered light and is stronger, but also provides a total ab darker.
The Tokina 12-24mm is better, and sound effects. Well, it has only poles and provides AF with 19mm focal length beginning not so much as the Canon …

My conclusion:

This is one of the worse-Canon lenses (tested on a 30D). It should be before you buy well informed and weigh …

translated from amazon.de customer review.

[Canon EF-S 70-200mm f/4L USM] A super-sub

by Astrid

When I looked in March increased the 300D, I am beside myself with the kit lens or a tele-bought, the price was very cheap and I was recommended by the seller. What did I learn about the issue of 200 euros annoyed! I agree with the part not become happy.

Meanwhile, I have learned that people are right who say that it is in relation to the quality of the images not so much on the camera, but rather on good lenses on the camera arrives. And of course, the photographer behind the camera :-)

For three weeks now I have 70 – 200 4 L, the instantaneous action Cashback from Canon, my purchasing process. And I’m just very happy with the optics.

First, it is altogether different in the hand, when the low-cost tele, which I had previously. It is not easy, but very well balanced and disturbs me from the weight at all.

Secondly, the quality of my pictures with the quality of my lenses really improved, even if top is still plenty of room. But that is definitely in me. Such good optics, like here, it is easier to make decent pictures and make the investment worthwhile.

What I think is very good that a lens hood is included – that is Canon is not so obvious. However, there is no tripod collar, so they need somewhere to save.

Why only four stars? I photograph a lot in nature and the color of the optics does not necessarily contribute to the fact that it is easier to adapt to any ranzuschleichen animals. But it’s really all I fault.

translated from amazon.de customer review.

[Canon EF-S 10-22mm USM] Clear Recommendation.

By M. Werner

The EF-S 10-22mm lens is Canon’s ultra-wide angle for EF-S compatible cameras (current models: EOS 450D, 1000D, 40D, 50D).

Kit lens of these cameras is typically the EF-S 18-55mm. In comparison, the 10-22 opening entirely new worlds. How much more of this lens really brings the picture illustrates, for example online review of cameralabs.com: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37qNBit9dlI

If the figures of interest: with a horizontal viewing angle of 97.17 compared with 64.5 degrees recorded the angle of 10-22 up to 3.2 times more image content. The telephoto end equivalent (converted at the old miniature camera) is about 35mm and the maximum wide-angle of most Pocket digicams.

The areas are thus clear: landscapes, indoor shots, big buildings.

The picture quality is absolutely convincing, even with the 10mm lens is almost distortion-free and (in my experience) with less chromatic aberration than the 18-55 kit lens at 18mm.

My tip: shoot RAW and possibly with the Canon Camera RAW tool to clean wegrechnen aberration.

Personally, I’m with the Canon EF-S 10-22mm – after many hundreds of pictures – very satisfied and can only recommend everyone this lens is part of the arsenal of a EF-S camera.

Apropos compulsory purchase – unfortunately, in this lens (as with all non-L-or DO-lenses) the lens hood (EW-83E) not in the package, and despite the surface treatment should be part of this almost always have it, straight from an extreme wide-angle like this .

4 stars, a page in the absence of the lens hood (would not be a leg break in the price), but because the corresponding EF-lens (EF 16-35mm 1:2.8 L) quality, but still plays in a class higher.

One more after this even more frequently on the 10-22 from Sigma reference is:
all the prophecies of doom, despite the price is the only valid argument for the Sigma. The Canon has better lens aperture values and allows shorter shutter speeds verwacklungsfreie or images in less light. The edge sharpness is better, the less chromatic aberrations. The Sigma has significant barrel distortion at 10mm and pincushion distortion at 22mm, the Canon almost completely straight lines.

Who is the best EF-S wide-angle zoom and not turn over every cent must be accessed here.

translated from amazon.de customer review.

Using Camera Lenses : Using Wide Angle Lenses

Click to continue reading “Using Camera Lenses : Using Wide Angle Lenses”

Canon EOS 50D Mark II Digital SLR Camera Reviews

This was my first Canon full CMOS DSLR camera. Prior to it I had owned and operated a Canon 40D, Canon 30D and Canon Rebel XTi. I am a wedding and sports photographer primarily, so I have been able to test the Canon 5D Mark II out under both of these conditions.

For basketball I used it with AI Servo, Center Point focus, but went into custom settings and enabled the AF assist dots. It worked like a dream, focusing faster and more accurately than my 40D ever had. While no, the FPS aren’t ideal for sports, if you can lock on focus like this from the start, you can still achieve amazing sports photographs. Plus the fact that I was able to shoot at ISO 4,000 and not have noticeable noise was just incredible. The shots auto-white balanced correctly too which normally in the arena I shoot at is not what happens on my 40D.

My first wedding all I could say all day was wow. I was getting available light photographs I never would have dreamed of before. The new screen also made it incredibly easy to determine if something was in focus or not. When I would switch between my 40D and 5D2 I found out just how spoiled that screen had made me, since the 40D screen looked terrible to me now when previously I thought that had a great screen. I sure was wrong! 920,000 pixels is definitely the way to go on this LCD. I primarily shot with center point (one shot) for my focus and it nailed focus every time. I did a mix up of manual, aperture priority and some program (Program mostly for the formals)

What else do I love about it? The 98% view finder is awesome. I like being able to use UDMA cards in it…

Video! Although I’m not a video / motion person by nature, I prefer stills, I’ve been testing out the video quite a bit. At Christmas I took a few short clips of my nephew and was really happy with how they look. It’s very neat to be able to take high definition video of a little kid and have that awesome affect of a wide aperture blurring out the background. The only downside is that the files are huge. My 1 minute clip was over 300MB, but that’s what I get for shooting in 1080!

The batteries this camera use really do hold a charge for a while. I used mine with the battery grip at the wedding, and the two batteries after going for over 500 shots (maybe close to 600 shots that day?) still had about 72% charge each left on them. I could easily have shot 3 times that much and still have had left over charge on the batteries. Also the new battery info screen is really nifty since you can see what serial number battery has what charge, making it a lot easier to keep track of.

So far I’ve used a 35 1.4/L, 135 2/L, 70-200 f2.8/L, 50 1.4, and 100 2.8 Macro on this camera body and all have performed wonderfully. I don’t miss the pop up flash that my 40D has since I never used it anyway, I always throw my 580 EX II on top when I need flash.

About Author
For more products information & Customer Reviews, visit Online Product Reviews.

Using Camera Lenses : Standard Camera Lenses

Click to continue reading “Using Camera Lenses : Standard Camera Lenses”

Easy AdSense by Unreal