Posts Tagged ‘Vibration Reduction’

[Nikon AF-S 70-300mm ED-IF VR] Sharp and slow

Recently I bought my first telephoto lens for my new (ish) Nikon D70, Nikkor lenses only confidence (literally can not afford not of good quality).

I tried a few times, architecture and portrait photography mostly.
As a “rookie” to photography, I thought it would be for my first telephoto lens to be within a reasonable budget, which is what I referred to the Haber-Guard had a Knallatevi around.
The goal is sehr well built and solid, heavy nuevolatively, but I doubt I would feel too much of a weight loss between lenses, a couple of grams eh? Until now, the sharpness of images produced when a tripod (without VR (Vibration Reduction) you’ll never in a position to a goal of 300 mm x 1.4 by hand without blurring the image, so I have horrible technique) .
The main interessatiquando I wahrscheinlichdies for the first time, the way was long, loud AF is often directly to the APPROACH a second on several occasions, even with a well-defined edge, which often focus needs to be done with manual focus, then click on the AF and leave it short, which is often the time to do it, but I see someone who should be knocking Athletics Odet photography?

In general, for the price, one or objectivity, but if you do not have time for MF, I recommend that you have a little more expensive lens. Good luck people.

[Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF VR Micro] World-class lens that

[Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF VR Micro] World-class lens that is just fun!

From Sub Rosa

Nikon 105 mm VR macro leaves no wish unfulfilled. It presents itself as a professional tool with many strengths and no weaknesses, is a lightweight (portrait) Tele class and a force as a macro. Thanks to the built-VR technology wobbles when shot from the hand nothing more, no more than one dachshund – through the picture. The interruptible and VR (Vibration Reduction) allows even without a tripod crisp macro shots even without antrainierte breathing technique and makes the macro-photographing quite incidentally also much more flexible and faster – not a disadvantage! Very laudable addition to the photographer to focus at any time intervene in the auto and manual focus can, without the lens mechanics suffer. The image quality is a luxury, not Randvignetierung, full colors and a super contrast performance. Already the previous model was one of the top macro lenses on the market. The successor but works for me, thanks to visual function and management figure alone at the top. A 100% Kauftipp and worth every penny!

translated from amazon.de customer review.

[Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF VR Micro] Professional lens not

[Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF VR Micro] Professional lens not only for macros

From N. Ishar

Since I have this lens, it is one of my favorite lenses become.

Technically it offers:
+ a continuous aperture of 2.8
+ Vibration Reduction (VR) IMAGE STABILIZER
+ The fixed focal length of 105mm
+ Metal case
+ Nanokristallverg?tung

The lens for professional purposes constructed (golden ring and strokes) is at first glance and first touch a very solid impression with his weight of about 600g, it is very good in the hand.
In connection with my d200 and! Battery grip! it has a perfect handling.

The photos: How my prescribing has written, the
105mm Vr brilliant image quality and sharpness “out of the box”

Unlike self we can not merely the lens in use macros very well!

I use it even for portrait photography because I like a 50mm 1.4 sometimes a little too short and one with focal length of the Model 105er not directly in front of the nose “herumturnt”.
For macros, the VR rather useless (as you so eh tripod and cable shutter SVA used) the more practical for portraits, etc.

Can be very effective as well with more flexibility in weaker light sharp photographs. Provided the model is quiet, can be an exposure time of 1 / 10 is still very good and sharp results.

Normally I would now write down the disadvantages, but there are none. Only a small reason to doubt purchase price could be.
This is my opinion, however, justified:
Because the lens is professionally processed and delivers superior image quality.

translated from amazon.de customer review.

[Nikon 18-200mm] When do so …… can not resist …

[Nikon 18-200mm] When do so …… can not resist …

I could not believe it, we were finally alone!
I admit that my eyes “insistent” had probably put a little ‘uncomfortable, but I could not do without.
Finally, you forward and, without much preamble, I asked: “Do you want to see?”
You can not imagine the embarrassment and make a bold reply: “Maybe first parliamentary un po ‘” … .. …
…. The chat lasted about 15 minutes, and then said: “Come on you can take!”

I could not really do without, and I did it guys … … … … .. not believe it, but I have taken in hand, trying to use all the delicacy possible, without of course forgetting the just close!
“It ’sa small but its the fact!” … … I thought, and of course it is enough to touch him because it gave the best of …

And there it is, I had between the hands, wonderful, I could not believe it, but just does not happen every day that have to do with a goal like this (sorry what you had thought ….?)
A 18-200 mm as this is not easy to find, there are very few around, and I want to describe starting with the wonderful acronym VR Vibration Reduction!
As early as I see her eyes were glazed, what does it mean?
Simply indicates that the target is incorporated stabilizer and stabilizer!
I could not believe my eyes you have, then when I read ED Extralow Dispersion … … …. At that moment I went into a broth Giuggioli: it means that were used some special lenses with low dispersion, and in this aim there are 2, and finally there are 3 aspherical lens surface.

We want to talk about the diaphragm?
But yes, talk is made up of 7 strips that allow an almost completely circular, and sorry if it is little!
This allows for a good read and an excellent contrast in the images out of focus.
What up?
A motor autofocus SWM Silent Wave Motor, and this is really a flagship of the Nikon, because it allows a very high speed action with a barely perceptible noise …. ….
We say that a goal is created exclusively for digital SLRs equipped with a sensor smaller than 24×36mm classic (DX).
But I would go back for a moment about those two beautiful abbreviation “VR” …!
Nikon says that with this stabilizer, you can take a very impressive time, about 4 times slower than normal.
For example, if before we had a good stability at 1/250s, now we can have the same result in 1/30s, and a hand like mine (which usually is not the greatest firmness) certainly the difference is not just 4 stop but probably 3rd

Now a small series of technical data, found that even on the internet never make male:
- Size: 77×96.5 mm
- Weight: 560 g
- Minimum focus 50 cm
- corner of field 76 ? to 8 ?
- Opticard: 16 lenses in 12 groups, 2 glasses ED, 3 aspherical lenses
- f/3.5-5.6 High Brightness Brightness min. f/22-36

And now enough data, go to the news, said that between us is perhaps known more for worse this gem: the price!
To buy it, it takes about 850 … .. !

Of course, for the moment, for me remains only a dream, because I have just started a “Save Campaign” to a desire (better to call it madness) even greater and probably unachievable, but I will try!
Gentlemen who can afford this price, and the Nikon camera that can mount (eg Nikon D200) assure that truly deserves … …

translated from caio.it

[Nikon 18-200mm] One for all?

By Jazzman

My experience with the AF-S 18-200 VR. I was already about 8 months and what support is primarily identified: I’m too lazy to drag and change lenses become. Must really the whole Geraffel each time with? For me not. If the best lens is not necessarily the best visually, but that which we most frequently used, then this is my best. Before too exaggerated expectations for optical performance must warn you, however. What makes the lens is not always the yellow from the egg, but it is also not a deterrent so bad that there are no usable images could generate.

The weaknesses are well known in the field distortion is less than 24 mm and 35 mm and very conspicuous at 18 mm really extremely fierce. Now the fall in the landscape photography is not as obviously as in architectural photography, which is more me. The vignetting I am, where they really stand out, fewer problems in the correction, chromatic aberration and keep still in the frame. Who in a 11-fold Superzoom at 18 mm with an open aperture still expect miracles, is himself to blame. The problem with self-made and slant to retract Tubus has also mine, so it is for use on a tripod outside the horizontal absolutely inappropriate (for example, objects vertically from top to photograph).

Strengths: The sharpness of the 18-200 is really a whole in order for such a universal zoom lens, but at least my copy is not so outstanding that they have a unique selling point would be. That you get with other manufacturers at a lower price, but then with less robust processing. What I do not want to miss more, the vibration reduction (VR). Very effective and extremely useful for freehand immovable photography motives. It replaces me a monopod, tripod.

The less distortion and sharper imaging alternative for me would be the AF-S VR was 16-85. When I’ve bought my 18-200, there was the 16-85 but not yet. Since I am the long focal lengths are not quite as frequently as the short and medium-sized and doing it with a slightly higher optical quality have, I would be today, maybe for the other model to decide, but it is a serious decision. Both on to does not make sense. Here, everyone wondering what he for personal motive and has focal length preferences.

The compromise reached for slow and lazy alternate hobby photographer I find good. I would recommend this lens as a travel lens for outdoors with a Nikon cameras easier to work with minimum cost and weight with the best possible photographs. Let everyone consider whether it would not end even with a bridge camera very well or would be better served. The needs and individual situations are simply too different.

translated from amazon.de customer review

Photography – Understanding how lenses work of image stabilization

If you do not buy a goal of image stabilization, it is possible, however, have heard the term "image stabilization" or "vibration reduction" bandied about in reference to various point-devices SLR and objectives. In this case, we realize that without doubt is, or is supposed to VR technology results in sharper images. But technology does not work, and how? What happens to make it work? In such situations, it does not work at all? And most important of all, do you really need? The answer to the first question is yes, the technology of image stabilization, not only works, it works well. Otherwise, the rest of this article is totally useless. But it is helpful to understand exactly what is the image stabilization, and when it can be used to improve your photos before you pay the few hundred dollars extra for a goal which was built in it.Note: Although the term "stabilization" is used more frequently when talking about writers of this argument, "vibration reduction is the term that Nikon uses to describe the same thing, as the lens, and also happens to better describe what is password. You should consider the two terms as interchangeable.To understand how vibration reduction, we consider for a moment the fact that fixed. When a camera at hand, and the shutter is open for a period longer than the camera can be done in one direction without moving, then the image is perceived to fade. What happens is that the camera lens tilts upwards, sideways, or a combination thereof, the position of image on the image sensor teams . A concentrate of light ends up being rendered as a line. The accumulation of all the shifted points of light that make up an image blur resulting image.The clear then the fix might be to move the image sensor in the same amount as each point of light is shifted, which " image and the image sensor to move together in lock step. Some manufacturers to implement this exact solution for the camera, and the floating image sensor so that it can control the image if the camera changes during the exhibition. But it is rather the exception than the rule. Generally, the solution is obtained by addition of vibration reduction of the objective, rather than the camera body.So how it works? Is actually quite simple to understand. Instead of a floating image sensor, the lens body contains floating elements. The position of these elements is controlled by motors that are coupled with sensors that detect the subject's body is turned vertically or horizontally when the lens body rotates exposure.If up, sensors compensate by saying that the engine Drop The objective has a floating po 'to keep the optical path of light traveling through the lenses. If the lens body is rotated to the left, to transfer the elements of the right to compensate. The end result is that the image retains its position on the image sensor during the exposure, creating an image far more than if the system to reduce vibration is disabled (you can). It seems incredible that the system is able to control the vibration of the camera as well. It is indeed remarkable, but because all the works of the movement of the camera can be controlled in every 1/1000th of a second, while the camera is balanced on a time scale, for example, 1/30th, 1 / 15th, or even 1 / 4 of one of these lenses, image stabilization second.Vendors argue that technology can save 3 to 4 stops of exposure. This means that if, for any photographic situation, the slower the speed of the results of an image is OK 1/125th of a second, then with the addition of vibration reduction that you should be able to 1 / 15th pulls 1/8th or perhaps even a second. This is a big problem if it is obliged to draw in the dark or light, or the need to close the opening to improve the depth of image stabilization field.But shows that in a range of speed of 'shutter which are not either too large or too small. If you try to hold your hand 1 seconds of exposure is unlikely your VR compensation will be able to follow the proposals of the supply is irregular. Similarly, if you shoot at 1/500th of a second or more, the device can experience jitter, so that the VR system adds nothing to remember about improvement.Another vibration reduction is that this has to do with the camera to compensate for movement during exposure. It has nothing to do with the speed of the object you are trying to photograph. While the rapid evolution of baseball will always be rendered as a blur unless you catch a 1/500th of what you need is second.Do or VR lenses to improve your photography? It is quite easy to answer. If you are regularly shooting at speeds of less than 1/250th of a second there's a good chance you can get rid of a significant number of these blurred or fuzzy, taken to invest in a good goal VR. Better still, when you buy your next digital camera, go to the point-and-shoot constructed with vibration reduction, or if you buy a digital SLR, try to take a model built with the reduction of vibrations in the kit provided objective. To help you choose a digital camera to begin with, I introduced you to an article on how to find the right Beginner Digital Camera.Whether you need a simple point-and-shoot model or a model more complex digital SLR, you can find the answers, and greatly reduced digital camera offers a http://www.bestdigitalcameradiscounts.com/

Stephen Carter is a web developer and creator of the review script Review Foundry. He is also the creator of Best Digital Camera Discounts His interest in photography spans decades.

Camera shake and image stabilization (Vibration Reduction)

When you are first buying camera equipment you see a lot of lenses that have IS or VR designations on them. This is the image stabilization or vibration reduction. They mean the same thing except Canon uses the first term and Nikon uses the second. These mechanisms are built into the device to avoid "camera shake". I would like to discuss how to get rid of camera shake, and the reason why I bought a VR myself.What goal is to shake the camera?
When you have your camera in hand and looking through the viewfinder to take your picture, your body is a slight movement. This is something natural, like your body is always correct muscles and initiatives to help keep your balance. However, it causes slight movement of the camera. When the camera is enlarged on a matter that is a reasonable distance, these small movements become more apparent.
For example. If your hand shakes slightly and the camera to 1 degree of line management and the object is located 15 meters, which corresponds to 3.1 inches which is added to the camera. Now, say that the movement of your hand happened when you took your image and, although the shutter is open. This blurring of images on film or digitally on your image.How can prevent blurred images from?
There are 3 ways to prevent them.

The author maintains the site www.thoughtsfrommylife.com.

Easy AdSense by Unreal